Valuation

Buying a Structured Settlement: How the Purchase Side Actually Works

Investors can buy the rights to someone else's future structured settlement payments at a discount. Here is how the purchase works, and its real risks.

Ioannis Kyprianou, ACCA-qualified accountantJuly 1, 20269 min read
Buying a Structured Settlement: How the Purchase Side Actually Works

Buying a structured settlement means purchasing the right to receive someone else's future settlement payments, in exchange for paying them a discounted lump sum today. The buyer is an investor; the seller is usually a person who was awarded a structured settlement after an injury and now wants cash sooner. Almost everything written about this market is aimed at the seller. This article looks at the other side of the table: what an investor is actually acquiring, how the deal is legally completed, and where the real risks sit.

It is written for people considering buying these payment streams as an income investment, and for anyone who simply wants to understand what happens to their payments after a sale. It is education, not a recommendation to buy or sell anything.

The numbers used below are illustrative examples to show the arithmetic. They are not offers, current yields, or guarantees. Discount rates, court practices, and tax rules change, so confirm the specifics with the parties involved and your own legal and tax advisers before acting.

What you are actually buying

You are not buying an insurance policy or opening an account. You are buying a contractual right to a defined set of future payments that an insurance company is already obligated to pay. In the original structured settlement, a life insurer issued an annuity to fund payments to an injured claimant, typically as tax-free compensation. For background on that original arrangement, see what a structured settlement is and the structured settlement annuity that funds it.

When the claimant sells, they assign specific payments to a buyer through what the law calls a structured settlement factoring transaction. If the seller assigns, say, sixty monthly payments starting three years out, the buyer becomes entitled to exactly those payments and nothing more. The underlying annuity does not change; only the person entitled to collect those particular payments does.

The buyer's return comes from the gap between what they pay now and the total of the payments they collect later. That gap is expressed as a discount rate, the same concept that determines what a seller receives, explained in how much a structured settlement is worth.

How the purchase is legally completed

This is the part that separates buying structured settlement payments from an ordinary private loan or investment: it cannot be done by private agreement alone. Every transfer must be approved in advance by a court.

Almost every state has a Structured Settlement Protection Act (SSPA). Under these statutes, a judge must review the proposed transfer and find that it is in the best interest of the seller, taking into account the welfare of any dependents, before the payments can legally change hands. The court reviews the discount rate, the seller's circumstances, and the fairness of the deal. Reinforcing this, the Internal Revenue Code imposes a 40% excise tax under IRC §5891 on anyone who acquires structured settlement payment rights in a factoring transaction, unless the transfer is approved in advance by a qualified court order. The mechanics of that approval are covered in the structured settlement court approval process and the Structured Settlement Protection Act guides.

For a buyer this has two consequences. First, the court order is not a formality; it is what makes the purchased right enforceable and keeps the punitive excise tax from applying. A transfer without a valid qualified order is both legally shaky and potentially subject to that 40% tax. Second, the timeline is longer than many investors expect, because you are waiting on a court docket, notice periods, and sometimes the issuing insurer's own transfer procedures.

An illustrative example of the arithmetic

Suppose a seller is entitled to 60 monthly payments of $1,000 each, beginning in three years, a total of $60,000 in future money. An investor will not pay $60,000 for that, because money arriving years from now is worth less than money today, and the investor wants a return.

If the deal is priced at a discount rate that values those future payments at, say, $38,000 today, the buyer pays $38,000 now and collects $60,000 over the payment period. The $22,000 difference is the investor's gross return, earned over the years the payments run, not all at once. The exact figure depends entirely on the discount rate agreed and approved.

Two things follow from this structure. The return is locked in at purchase if every payment arrives as scheduled, which is unusual among fixed-income investments. But it is also completely illiquid: the buyer's money is committed until the payments come in, and there is no simple way to get it back early. How discount rates are set on both the funding side and the resale side is discussed in structured settlement annuity rates.

The risks a buyer takes on

The pitch for these investments leans on the word "guaranteed." The scheduled payments are indeed backed by a life insurer's annuity, which is a real strength. But "guaranteed payment" is not the same as "risk-free investment," and the differences matter.

  • Credit risk of the issuing insurer. The payments are only as reliable as the life insurance company funding the annuity. That risk is usually modest for a highly rated insurer, but it is not zero and it is not federally insured. There is no FDIC coverage; the backstop is the insurer's strength and state guaranty associations, within limits.
  • Illiquidity. Your capital is tied up for the full payment schedule. If you need cash, selling the rights on again means another court-approved factoring transaction, at whatever discount the market offers then.
  • Legal and documentation risk. The value of what you bought rests on a valid court order and a clean chain of title to the specific payments. Defective paperwork, a competing assignment of the same payments, or a flawed order can undermine the position. This is why buyers rely on experienced counsel rather than doing it informally.
  • Servicing and collection. Someone has to make sure the insurer redirects the payments correctly and handles any disputes. Individual buyers usually purchase through a servicing arrangement rather than collecting directly.
  • Reinvestment and rate risk. The return is fixed at purchase. If prevailing yields rise afterward, you are locked into the older rate for the life of the payments.

None of this makes the asset bad. It makes it a specific, illiquid, legally intensive fixed-income instrument that behaves nothing like a bank product.

How the tax side differs for a buyer

This is a point that trips people up, so it is worth stating plainly. The original personal-injury payments were tax-free to the claimant under IRC §104(a)(2), and the tax law confirms that a later factoring transaction does not undo that treatment for the person who was compensated. Our overview of whether structured settlements are taxable covers the claimant's side.

That tax-free character does not simply transfer to an investor who buys the payments. The buyer is not receiving compensation for a physical injury; they are earning a return on capital they deployed. As a general matter, an investor's return on purchased payment streams is treated as taxable income rather than tax-free proceeds, and the details depend on how the purchase is structured and reported. Do not assume you inherit the seller's tax exemption. This is a question to settle with a tax adviser before committing funds, not after.

Is buying the right move?

Whether these payments belong in a portfolio depends on what an investor is trying to do. The appeal is a defined, insurer-backed cash-flow stream, often at a higher yield than comparable-quality bonds, bought from a motivated seller. The cost of that yield is illiquidity, legal complexity, and dependence on a single insurer's strength for each stream. It is closer in spirit to holding a private, non-tradable bond than to any deposit or brokerage account.

If you are on the selling side and trying to understand who is buying and why, the companion pieces on selling a structured settlement and structured settlement versus lump sum explain the trade you would be making. Understanding both sides tends to produce better decisions on either.

Frequently asked questions

Can an ordinary investor legally buy someone's structured settlement payments?

Yes, but only through a court-approved factoring transaction. A judge must find the transfer is in the seller's best interest under the state's Structured Settlement Protection Act, and IRC §5891 imposes a 40% excise tax on acquiring the payment rights unless a qualified court order approves the transfer in advance. Most individual buyers go through firms that handle the court process and servicing.

Are the returns from buying structured settlement payments tax-free?

Generally no. The tax-free treatment under IRC §104(a)(2) belongs to the injured claimant who was compensated, not to an investor buying the payments for a return. An investor's gain is usually taxable, and the exact treatment depends on how the deal is structured. Confirm your position with a tax adviser before buying.

How safe are these payments?

The scheduled payments are backed by a life insurer's annuity, which is generally reliable but not FDIC-insured or risk-free. The main risks are the credit strength of the issuing insurer, the illiquidity of your capital, and the legal integrity of the court order and title to the payments. Highly rated insurers and clean, court-approved documentation reduce, but do not eliminate, those risks.

Can I sell the payments again if I need my money back?

Only by arranging another factoring transaction, which again requires court approval and will be priced at whatever discount rate the market offers at that time. Treat the investment as illiquid: your capital is realistically committed for the full length of the payment schedule.

This article is educational and not personal financial, legal, or tax advice. Structured settlement transfers are governed by state Structured Settlement Protection Acts and federal tax rules that change and vary by state. Anyone buying or selling these payments should work with qualified legal and tax advisers before proceeding.


This guide is for general educational purposes only and is not financial, tax, or legal advice. Rates and rules change; verify current figures before acting. Consult a licensed professional about your situation.